Vincenzo MEZZELA <vincenzo.mezzela@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Part of the documentation text is included in the readelf output code > block. Hence, split the code block and move the affected text outside. > > Signed-off-by: Vincenzo MEZZELA <vincenzo.mezzela@xxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/livepatch/module-elf-format.rst | 17 ++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/module-elf-format.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/module-elf-format.rst > index a03ed02ec57e..eadcff224335 100644 > --- a/Documentation/livepatch/module-elf-format.rst > +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/module-elf-format.rst > @@ -217,16 +217,23 @@ livepatch relocation section refer to their respective symbols with their symbol > indices, and the original symbol indices (and thus the symtab ordering) must be > preserved in order for apply_relocate_add() to find the right symbol. > > -For example, take this particular rela from a livepatch module::: > +For example, take this particular rela from a livepatch module: > + > +:: The right fix here is to just delete the extra ":" > Relocation section '.klp.rela.btrfs.text.btrfs_feature_attr_show' at offset 0x2ba0 contains 4 entries: > Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend > 000000000000001f 0000005e00000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .klp.sym.vmlinux.printk,0 - 4 > > - This rela refers to the symbol '.klp.sym.vmlinux.printk,0', and the symbol index is encoded > - in 'Info'. Here its symbol index is 0x5e, which is 94 in decimal, which refers to the > - symbol index 94. > - And in this patch module's corresponding symbol table, symbol index 94 refers to that very symbol: > +This rela refers to the symbol '.klp.sym.vmlinux.printk,0', and the symbol > +index is encoded in 'Info'. Here its symbol index is 0x5e, which is 94 in > +decimal, which refers to the symbol index 94. > + > +And in this patch module's corresponding symbol table, symbol index 94 refers > +to that very symbol: > + > +:: You can put that extra colon here rather than introducing a separate "::" line. Thanks, jon
