On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:42:57PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 07:06:55 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > Here is one example how it is done by HP switches: > > https://arubanetworking.hpe.com/techdocs/AOS-CX/10.08/HTML/monitoring_6200/Content/Chp_PoE/PoE_cmds/pow-ove-eth-all-by.htm > > > > switch(config)# interface 1/1/1 <---- per interface > > switch(config-if)# power-over-ethernet allocate-by usage > > switch(config-if)# power-over-ethernet allocate-by class > > > > Cisco example: > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus9000/sw/93x/power-over-ethernet/configuration/configuring-power-over-ethernet/m-configuring-power-over-ethernet.html > > > > switch(config)# interface ethernet1/1 <---- per interface > > switch(config-if)# power inline auto > > I don't see any mention of a domain in these docs. > This patchset is creating a concept of "domain" but does > not expose it as an object. Ok, I see. @Köry, can you please provide regulator_summary with some inlined comments to regulators related to the PSE components and PSE related outputs of ethtool (or what ever tool you are using). I wont to use this examples to answer. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
