Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Document sending DTS patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Document two rules already widely used and enforced by DT maintainers
> and SoC platform maintainers:
> 
> 1. DTS patches should be placed at the end of driver patchset to
>    indicate no dependencies of driver code on DTS.
> 
> 2. DTS patches should be applied via SoC platform maintainers, because
>    it is a driver-independent hardware description.  However some
>    driver maintainers are reluctant to pick up portions of patchsets and
>    prefer to take entire set at once.  For such cases, the DTS portion
>    should be split into separate patchset, so it will not end up in the
>    driver subsystem integration tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/submitting-patches.rst           | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I've applied both patches.

Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux