On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:49:19 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:42:22PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:19:13 +0100
> > Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c
> > > index 44ded2aa6fca..c9fa60b314ce 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c
> > > @@ -976,8 +976,10 @@ pd692x0_register_managers_regulator(struct pd692x0_priv *priv,
> > > reg_name_len = strlen(dev_name(dev)) + 23;
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < nmanagers; i++) {
> > > + static const char * const regulators[] = { "vaux5", "vaux3p3" };
> >
> > Looks like the 'static' is not needed here :)
>
> Have you checked the compiler output before saying that?
No I have not
> I've seen plenty of instances where "static" should be there but isn't,
> leading to the compiler generating inline code to create the
> array/struct on the stack.
Makes sense then, so it should be good here.
Thanks,
Maxime
