Re: [PATCH v11 00/23] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Reinette,

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:18 PM Reinette Chatre
<reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 2/14/25 10:31 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> > On 2/14/2025 12:26 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >> On 2/13/25 9:37 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:33:31PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >>>> On 2/12/25 9:46 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:20:08PM -0600, Babu Moger wrote:
>
> (quoting relevant parts with goal to focus discussion on new possible syntax)
>
> >>>> I see the support for MPAM events distinct from the support of assignable counters.
> >>>> Once the MPAM events are sorted, I think that they can be assigned with existing interface.
> >>>> Please help me understand if you see it differently.
> >>>>
> >>>> Doing so would need to come up with alphabetical letters for these events,
> >>>> which seems to be needed for your proposal also? If we use possible flags of:
> >>>>
> >>>> mbm_local_read_bytes a
> >>>> mbm_local_write_bytes b
> >>>>
> >>>> Then mbm_assign_control can be used as:
> >>>> # echo '//0=ab;1=b' >/sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mbm_assign_control
> >>>> # cat /sys/fs/resctrl/mon_data/mon_L3_00/mbm_local_read_bytes
> >>>> <value>
> >>>> # cat /sys/fs/resctrl/mon_data/mon_L3_00/mbm_local_bytes
> >>>> <sum of mbm_local_read_bytes and mbm_local_write_bytes>
> >>>>
> >>>> One issue would be when resctrl needs to support more than 26 events (no more flags available),
> >>>> assuming that upper case would be used for "shared" counters (unless this interface is defined
> >>>> differently and only few uppercase letters used for it). Would this be too low of a limit?
>
> As mentioned above, one possible issue with existing interface is that
> it is limited to 26 events (assuming only lower case letters are used). The limit
> is low enough to be of concern.

The events which can be monitored by a single counter on ABMC and MPAM
so far are combinable, so 26 counters per group today means it limits
breaking down MBM traffic for each group 26 ways. If a user complained
that a 26-way breakdown of a group's MBM traffic was limiting their
investigation, I would question whether they know what they're looking
for.

-Peter





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux