Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/omap: Convert to devicetree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Florian,

>>
On 12/17/2013 06:53 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
As OMAP2+ is moving to a full DT boot for 3.14, commit 7ce93f3
"ARM: OMAP2+: Fix more missing data for omap3.dtsi file" adds
basic DT bits. But the driver is not yet converted, so this will
not work and driver will not be probed. Convert it!

Apart from standard bindings, this patch uses 'dma-window' (already
used by Tegra SMMU) and adds a custom 'ti,#tlb-entries' binding.

Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxx>
---
   .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/ti,omap-iommu.txt    | 19 ++++++++++++
   arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-iommu.c                   |  5 +++
   drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c                         | 36
+++++++++++++++++++---
   3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/ti,omap-iommu.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/ti,omap-iommu.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/ti,omap-iommu.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4e5027c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/ti,omap-iommu.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+OMAP3 IOMMU used by camera subsystem

As I mentioned in comments on your cover-letter, the current binding is
only limited to OMAP3 ISP, but the driver is common for all OMAP2+ SoCs.
This binding an update to handle all SoCs.

To summarize the differences, OMAP2/3 has the same MMU register set for
all remote processor MMUs (IVA/DSP/ISP) with the only difference being
the number of TLBs supported (8 for ISP on OMAP2/3 and 32 for all other
instances on all OMAP2+ SoCs). Depending on whether the compatibility
property is defined for an SoC or for the processor, "ti,#tlb-entries"
can be retrieved directly from the match data or made as an optional
property, with the default value being 32.


It makes sense.

OMAP4 and OMAP5 have some additional registers (MMU_FAULT_PC,
MMU_FAULT_STATUS, MMU_GP_REG/DSPSS_MMU_GPR) on top of the OMAP2/OMAP3
ones, and DRA7 a further superset of OMAP4/OMAP5. The only difference is
the definition of the MMU_GPR register, which is different between the
IPU and DSP processors, but present at the same offset, and dictates the
validity of the MMU_FAULT_PC and MMU_FAULT_STATUS registers. The MMU_GPR
register is also not defined on OMAP4430 ES1.0, but is present on all
other newer SoCs.


Thank you for this detailed comparison ! I do not know much about
OMAP4 and OMAP5. In the current implementation, I was unable to find
references to these specificities. Is this currently supported?

OMAP4 iommu devices are instantiated today in legacy form, using the hwmod data. These are used by the remoteproc driver. OMAP5 data has not yet been added, as there is no point in adding it in legacy form at the moment.


+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : "ti,omap3-mmu-isp"
My suggestion would be to use
     "ti,omap2-iommu" for OMAP2/OMAP3 MMUs with the optional
"ti,#tlb-entries" to distinguish ISP MMU.
     "ti,omap4-iommu" for OMAP4/OMAP5 MMUs with an additional boolean
property to distinguish the presence/functionality of the MMU_GPR register
     "ti,dra7-iommu" for DRA7 MMUs

Mark, Tony,
Do you have any other recommendations given the above summary?

+- ti,hwmods : "mmu_isp"
Replace with general description


You mean something like "Name of the hwmod associated to the IOMMU"?

Yes.

regards
Suman

[snip]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux