On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 12:24 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andres Urian Florez <andres.emb.sys@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Fixed spelling mistake identified by codespell in the drm-uapi > > documentation > > > > Signed-off-by: Andres Urian Florez <andres.emb.sys@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > > index 69f72e71a96e..64e002c6383c 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > > @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ ENOSPC: > > EPERM/EACCES: > > Returned for an operation that is valid, but needs more privileges. > > E.g. root-only or much more common, DRM master-only operations return > > - this when called by unpriviledged clients. There's no clear > > + this when called by unprivileged clients. There's no clear > > difference between EACCES and EPERM. > > This is a fine patch, but it should really have been copied to the DRM > maintainers; I think scripts/get_maintainer.pl should have told you > that? > > Thanks, > > jon Sorry, including missing maintainers. Thanks, Andres
