Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: fix minor grammatical issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seyediman Seyedarab <imandevel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 25/02/03 06:40PM, Seyediman Seyedarab wrote:
>> The following grammatical issues have been fixed:
>> - Corrected subject-verb agreement
>> - Replaced incorrect noun "setup" with the correct verb form "set up."
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab <ImanDevel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
>> index abfe220764e1..6a3ae069c829 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Drivers must initialize the mode setting core by calling
>>  drmm_mode_config_init() on the DRM device. The function
>>  initializes the :c:type:`struct drm_device <drm_device>`
>>  mode_config field and never fails. Once done, mode configuration must
>> -be setup by initializing the following fields.
>> +be set up by initializing the following fields.
>>  
>>  -  int min_width, min_height; int max_width, max_height;
>>     Minimum and maximum width and height of the frame buffers in pixel
>> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ rollback:
>>    should not interfere, and not get stalled due to output routing changing on
>>    different CRTCs.
>>  
>> -Taken all together there's two consequences for the atomic design:
>> +Taken all together there are two consequences for the atomic design:
>>  
>>  - The overall state is split up into per-object state structures:
>>    :c:type:`struct drm_plane_state <drm_plane_state>` for planes, :c:type:`struct
>> -- 
>> 2.48.1
>> 
>
> Just following up on this patch I sent on 25/02/03. It's a small
> typo fix in the drm-kms documentation, nothing major, but I just
> wanted to make sure it hasn't slipped through the cracks.
> Appreciate any feedback when you get a chance. Thanks!

Please resend that patch after using scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get
the proper recipient list.  The DRM folks handle their own documentation
patches, so I can't apply this one.

Thanks,

jon




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux