Hi Tony, On 2/13/25 10:39 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> Yes, although there is some hard-to-avoid fuzz about the precise >> meaning of "local" and "total". > > Things are only getting fuzzier with mixed DDR and CXL memory. > >> As Reinette pointed out, there is the also the possibility of adding >> new named events other than "local" and "total" if we find that some >> kinds of event don't fit these categories. > > Not just new names, new scopes too. Patches coming later this year > that would present: > > $ cd sys/fs/resctrl > $ cat mon_data/mon_PKG_00/llc_stalls > 779762866739 Thank you for catching this. To support this would not be possible for the current plan for mbm_assign_control since it does not have a way to distinguish domain X of the PKG resource from domain X of the L3 resource. Sounds like we need to include the resource name in the mbm_assign_control syntax? Reinette
