Re: [PATCH v3] intel_idle: introduce 'no_native' module parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/12/25 7:46 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Wed, 2025-02-12 at 07:41 -0500, David Arcari wrote:
- #ifdef the code that doesn't compile
- default no_acpi=true in the !CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE case

I sort of like the second option better, but I worry about the
documentation.  Specifically:

"In the case that ACPI is not configured these flags have no impact
+on functionality."

I guess that is still true.

Perhaps there is a better option.  What do you think?

I've not been involved into kernel that much for long time. In old days
sprinkling #ifdefs around was an anti-pattern. Most probably nowadays too. So
the second option sounds better to me.

Another option would be to change the offending code to a function call:

if (ignore_native()) {

And have ignore_native() always return false when ACPI is not configured.

And yes I should have built and tested the kernel with ACPI disabled. My apologies.

I will do that for v4.

-DA


Artem.






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux