On Friday 20 December 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Bjorn Andersson > <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > No matter how we build the individual pinctrl drivers we will always > > need the pinctrl framework in a multi-soc zImage; so I can't see that > > we gain anything from being able to compile PINCTRL as a module. > > I discussed this matter with Christian on IRC and I believe we could > basically do "select PINCTRL" on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM as the > vast majority of multiplatforms appear to be using this anyway, this > would make the submenu for pin control pop up in menuconfig > for this, and make it possible to move different subdrivers to modules > if desired. > > MULTIPLATFORM does not seem to be about saving footprint bytes > on a very fine-granular level anyway, more about doing the module > loading/unloading approach to footprint. Let's review the list of platforms that don't select PINCTRL. There are some platforms that are indeed sensitive about memory footprint, and I promised people that converting to multiplatform won't cause a significant increase in kernel binary size as long as no other platforms are enabled. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
