On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 09:50:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Ah, neat, that would almost solve the problem but you wrote: > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/memblock/reserve_mem.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > so no, this does not work like that. You use devicetree here namespace > > and ignore its rules. > > ... and that obviously is barely parseable, so maybe one more try: > "You use here devicetree namespace but ignore its rules." It makes sense to me, there should be zero cross-over of the two specs, KHO should be completely self defined and stand alone. There is some documentation missing, I think. This yaml describes one node type, but the entire overall structure of the fdt does not seem to have documentation? Jason
