[PATCH v19 05/11] perf: arm_v7_pmu: Don't disable counter in (armv7|krait_|scorpion_)pmu_enable_event()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently (armv7|krait_|scorpion_)pmu_enable_event() start by disabling
the event counter it has been asked to enable. This should not be
necessary as the counter (and the PMU as a whole) should not be active
when *_enable_event() is called.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
index 7fa88e3b64e0..17831e1920bd 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
@@ -857,8 +857,6 @@ static void armv7pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(idx);
-
 	/*
 	 * Set event (if destined for PMNx counters)
 	 * We only need to set the event for the cycle counter if we
@@ -1450,8 +1448,6 @@ static void krait_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	int idx = hwc->idx;
 
-	armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(idx);
-
 	/*
 	 * Set event (if destined for PMNx counters)
 	 * We set the event for the cycle counter because we
@@ -1762,8 +1758,6 @@ static void scorpion_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	int idx = hwc->idx;
 
-	armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(idx);
-
 	/*
 	 * Set event (if destined for PMNx counters)
 	 * We don't set the event for the cycle counter because we

-- 
2.47.2





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux