Hello Simon,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:35:44AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 04:11:28PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:16:40AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > Move the static buffers from send_msg_no_fragmentation() and
> > > send_msg_fragmented() into the netconsole_target structure. This
> > > simplifies the code by:
> > > - Eliminating redundant static buffers
> > > - Centralizing buffer management in the target structure
> > > - Reducing memory usage by 1KB (one buffer instead of two)
> > >
> > > The buffer in netconsole_target is protected by target_list_lock,
> > > maintaining the same synchronization semantics as the original code.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/netconsole.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > > index 86ab4a42769a49eebe5dd6f01dafafc6c86ec54f..1a78704681184673f5c1ba8ae665e46751384293 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > > @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct netconsole_target {
> > > bool extended;
> > > bool release;
> > > struct netpoll np;
> > > + /* protected by target_list_lock */
> > > + char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK];
> >
> > nit: buf should also be added to the Kernel doc for this structure.
> >
> > ...
>
> Hi Breno,
>
> With that fixed feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks again for the review.
I will update according to your suggestion, and send the new version
after the merge window is opened.
--breno
