Re: [PATCH v1 07/12] mm/page_vma_mapped: device-private entries are not migration entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31.01.25 00:36, Alistair Popple wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:54:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
It's unclear why they would be considered migration entries; they are
not.
Yeah, I agree that doesn't seem right. I suspect I was initially modelling
device exclusive entries similar to migration entries but obviously went too
far. So thanks for fixing:

Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks ... fixing all the wrong use of "device-private" in the 
subject+description ... not sure what my mind was doing there.
It's all about "device-exclusive" of course.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux