Re: [PATCH] doc/RCU/listRCU: fix an example code snippets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping

On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 08:23:06AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>The example code for "Eliminating Stale Data" looks not correct:
>
>  * rcu_read_unlock() should put after kstrdup()
>  * spin_unlock() should be called before return
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>---
>Hope my understanding is correct.
>---
> Documentation/RCU/listRCU.rst | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.rst
>index ed5c9d8c9afe..8df50fcd69fd 100644
>--- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.rst
>+++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.rst
>@@ -348,9 +348,10 @@ to accomplish this would be to add a ``deleted`` flag and a ``lock`` spinlock to
> 					rcu_read_unlock();
> 					return AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT;
> 				}
>-				rcu_read_unlock();
> 				if (state == AUDIT_STATE_RECORD)
> 					*key = kstrdup(e->rule.filterkey, GFP_ATOMIC);
>+				spin_unlock(&e->lock);
>+				rcu_read_unlock();
> 				return state;
> 			}
> 		}
>-- 
>2.34.1

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux