On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/01/2025 16:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 20/01/2025 14:07, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > >>> Driver configures multiple misc-device on the MU, for multiple > >>> user-space applications, to be able to communicate over single MU. > >>> > >>> It exists on some i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93 etc. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx> > >>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>> Where Conor's review tag was actually given? > >> On v6. > > > > I already looked there. No trace for tag. Please point to the message. > > > Still no answer from you, except that evading answer, so let's be clear: > don't create fake tags. > > Clean your patchset from all fake tags and keep only the ones which were > real. Ye, I don't see that R-b given either. My guess is that somehow "go for it :+1: was interpreted as one, but it certainly was not meant to be one. Converting that to a tag is definitely not okay. Seems it appeared in v9 after Rob prompted about /his/ missing review from v8. I never use my k.org email in tags, so that is an immediate red flag. I think I never re-opened this thread after seeing that Rob had approved it back in v8, so I never noticed. Only by chance that I opened in now. Thanks for spotting it :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
