On 21-01-25, 08:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 6f45684483c4..b2a8efa83c98 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -733,12 +733,20 @@ __weak int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> {
> ssize_t ret;
> int freq;
>
> - freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
> + freq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPUFREQ_ARCH_CUR_FREQ)
> + ? arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu)
> + : 0;
> +
> if (freq > 0)
> ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", freq);
> else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
Maybe this should be a separate commit ? And also I am not very happy
with the new kconfig option. I don't want others to use it as we want
to get rid of this for X86 too eventually. Making it a kconfig option
allows anyone to enable it and then depend on it without us knowing..
Rather just write it as "if (x86)", with a comment on what we plan to
do with it in few release cycles.
--
viresh
