Re: [PATCH] Documentation/sysctl: Add timer_migration to kernel.rst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jon,

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:40:10AM -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Phil Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:08:13AM -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >> Phil Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> 
> >> > There is no mention of timer_migration in the docs. Add
> >> > a short description.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > ---
> >> >  Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst | 7 +++++++
> >> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> >> > index b2b36d0c3094..e03691e2cf4a 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> >> > @@ -1544,6 +1544,13 @@ constant ``FUTEX_TID_MASK`` (0x3fffffff).
> >> >  If a value outside of this range is written to ``threads-max`` an
> >> >  ``EINVAL`` error occurs.
> >> >  
> >> > +timer_migration
> >> > +===============
> >> > +
> >> > +When set, attempt to migrate timers away from idle cpus to allow them to remain
> >> > +in low power states longer.
> >> > +
> >> > +Default is set.
> >> 
> >> When set to *what*?  It will always be set to *some* value, right?  So
> >> we should really say what the specific values mean.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Well, it's boolean so set means 1 and unset is 0. I was using the same
> > style as the one below it:
> >
> > "
> > traceoff_on_warning
> > ===================
> >
> > When set, disables tracing (see Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst) when a
> > ``WARN()`` is hit.
> >
> > "
> 
> Just saying it's a boolean would help.  And our existing documentation
> should rarely be taken as an example of what *good* documentation would
> be... :)
> 
> > But I can change it to "enabled (1)" or something if you prefer.
> 
> "When set to a non-zero value" or some such would, I think, be a lot
> more clear and make a better example for the next person to come along.
> 
> Get me an updated version and I can still queue it for 6.14.


It's sent but I failed to do it as a reply to this message.
Sorry about that.


Cheers,
Phil


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon
> 

-- 





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux