Hi Steven,
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 6:08 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:21:35 -0800
> Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I personally find the date helpful as it can help place a commit without
> > needing to take the extra time to do a lookup.
>
> I've never found dates to be meaningful. I'm always more concerned about
> when a commit was added to mainline. Thus the version where the commit was
> added is very important for me. This is why I keep a bare clone of Linus's
> tree and commonly do:
>
> $ git describe --contains fd3040b9394c
> v5.19-rc1~159^2~154^2
> $ git describe --contains a76053707dbf
> v5.15-rc1~157^2~376^2~4
>
> I can easily see that a76053707dbf was added in 5.15 and fd3040b9394c was
> added in 5.19. The amount of work needed to add dates to Fixes tags would
> greatly exceed the amount of added work someone would need to do to do the
> above operations if they wanted to know the order of commits.
FTR, while I do not support adding dates to Fixes-tags, I would just
need to make a small modification to my fixes alias:
$ git help fixes
'fixes' is aliased to 'show --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")' -s'
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
