On 1/11/25 21:14, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > I plan on replacing refcount_t usage here with an atomic since, as > Hillf noted, refcount is not designed to be used for locking. And will > make sure the down_read_trylock() replacement will provide an acquire > fence. Could Hillf stop reducing the Cc list on his replies? The whole subthread went to only few people :(