Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] selftest: tun: Add tests for virtio-net hashing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025/01/09 23:36, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The added tests confirm tun can perform RSS and hash reporting, and
reject invalid configurations for them.

Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile |   2 +-
  tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c    | 558 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 551 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
index cb2fc601de66..92762ce3ebd4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
@@ -121,6 +121,6 @@ $(OUTPUT)/reuseport_bpf_numa: LDLIBS += -lnuma
  $(OUTPUT)/tcp_mmap: LDLIBS += -lpthread -lcrypto
  $(OUTPUT)/tcp_inq: LDLIBS += -lpthread
  $(OUTPUT)/bind_bhash: LDLIBS += -lpthread
-$(OUTPUT)/io_uring_zerocopy_tx: CFLAGS += -I../../../include/
+$(OUTPUT)/io_uring_zerocopy_tx $(OUTPUT)/tun: CFLAGS += -I../../../include/
include bpf.mk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c
index 463dd98f2b80..9424d897e341 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c
@@ -2,21 +2,37 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include <endian.h>
  #include <errno.h>
  #include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
  #include <stdio.h>
  #include <stdlib.h>
  #include <string.h>
  #include <unistd.h>
-#include <linux/if.h>
+#include <net/if.h>
+#include <netinet/ip.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/icmp.h>
+#include <linux/if_arp.h>
  #include <linux/if_tun.h>
+#include <linux/ipv6.h>
  #include <linux/netlink.h>
  #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
-#include <sys/ioctl.h>
-#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <linux/sockios.h>
+#include <linux/tcp.h>
+#include <linux/udp.h>
+#include <linux/virtio_net.h>

Are all these include changes strictly needed? Iff so, might as well
fix ordering to be alphabetical (lexicographic).

Yes. I placed header files in linux/ after the other header files because include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h requires libc header files to be placed before linux/ ones.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux