> On 10 Jan 2025, at 2:44 AM, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 05:49:39PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:48:36AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 12:59:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>>> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -1 ; time make -C tools/perf build-test >>>> d06826160a982494 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) perf tools: Remove dependency on libaudit >>>> make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf' >>>> - tarpkg: ./tests/perf-targz-src-pkg . >>>> make_static: cd . && make LDFLAGS=-static NO_PERF_READ_VDSO32=1 NO_PERF_READ_VDSOX32=1 NO_JVMTI=1 NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 NO_LIBELF=1 -j28 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.JJT3tvN7bV >>>> make_with_gtk2: cd . && make GTK2=1 -j28 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.BF53V2qpl3 >>>> - /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP: cd . && make FEATURE_DUMP_COPY=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP feature-dump >>>> cd . && make FEATURE_DUMP_COPY=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP feature-dump >>>> make_no_libbionic_O: cd . && make NO_LIBBIONIC=1 FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.KZuQ0q2Vs6 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.0sxMyH91gS >>>> make_util_map_o_O: cd . && make util/map.o FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.Y0Mx3KLREI DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.wg9HCVVLHE >>>> make_install_O: cd . && make install FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.P0LEBAkW1X DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.agTavZndFN >>>> failed to find: etc/bash_completion.d/perf >>> >>> Is this something introduced by this patch? >> >> I don't think so. >> >> BTW this series is already pushed out to perf-tools-next: >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/log/?h=perf-tools-next >> >> Thanks! >> >> - Arnaldo > > Thank you! > > - Charlie Hi Charlie, Arnaldo While testing the series, I hit compilation issue in powerpc Snippet of logs: CC util/syscalltbl.o In file included from /home/athira/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/syscall_table.h:5, from util/syscalltbl.c:16: arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:16:16: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init] 16 | [13] = "time", | ^~~~~~ arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:16:16: note: (near initialization for ‘syscalltbl[13]’) arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:22:16: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init] 22 | [18] = "oldstat", | ^~~~~~~~~ arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:22:16: note: (near initialization for ‘syscalltbl[18]’) arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:27:16: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init] 27 | [22] = "umount", | ^~~~~~~~ And similar errors is there for few more entries. The reason is that, the generated syscalls file has two entries for each of these failing cases.
