Hello, On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 12:44:15PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > It would have been good to include the cgroup maintainer here; adding > Tejun. > > Looking at the code, it's far from clear to me that the other cgroups > pay attention to this parameter. Can somebody convince me that this > change is correct? I don't think the patch is correct. The extra comment does still hold. Thanks. -- tejun
