On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:56:33PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:22:04PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 02:37:29PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Previously xfrm_dev_state_advance_esn() was added for RX only. But > > > it's possible that ESN context also need to be synced to hardware for > > > TX, so call it for outbound in this patch. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst | 3 ++- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c | 3 +++ > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 3 +++ > > > net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 1 + > > > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Steffen, > > > > This is kindly reminder. > > Sorry for the dealy, the holidays came faster than expected :) > > > > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c > > > index bc56c6305725..e500aebbad22 100644 > > > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c > > > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c > > > @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static int xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_esn(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff > > > } > > > > > > replay_esn->oseq = oseq; > > > + xfrm_dev_state_advance_esn(x); > > This is the only line of code that this patchset adds > to the xfrm stack, so merging this through mlx5 might > create less conflicts. > > In case you want to do that, you can add my 'Acked-by' > to this patch. Otherwise I'll pull it into the ipsec-next > tree tomorrow. Let's do it through your tree, please. IMHO, it is more appropriate. Thanks
