Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/9] bnxt_en: add support for tcp-data-split ethtool command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 07:25:19AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:14:01 +0900 Taehee Yoo wrote:
> > > > The bnxt_en disallows setting up both single and multi buffer XDP, but core
> > > > checks only single buffer XDP. So, if multi buffer XDP is attaching to
> > > > the bnxt_en driver when HDS is enabled, the core can't filter it.  
> > >
> > > Hm. Did you find this in the code, or did Broadcom folks suggest it?
> > > AFAICT bnxt supports multi-buf XDP. Is there something in the code
> > > that special-cases aggregation but doesn't work for pure HDS?  
> > 
> > There were some comments about HDS with XDP in the following thread.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241022162359.2713094-1-ap420073@xxxxxxxxx/T/
> > I may misunderstand reviews from Broadcom folks.
> 
> I see it now in bnxt_set_rx_skb_mode. I guess with high MTU
> the device splits in some "dumb" way, at a fixed offset..
> You're right, we have to keep the check in the driver, 
> at least for now.

The mutlti-buffer implementation followed what was done at the time in
other drivers.  Is the 'dumb way' you mention this check?

 4717                 if (dev->mtu > BNXT_MAX_PAGE_MODE_MTU) {
 4718                         bp->flags |= BNXT_FLAG_JUMBO;
 4719                         bp->rx_skb_func = bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb;
 4720                 } else {
 4721                         bp->flags |= BNXT_FLAG_NO_AGG_RINGS;
 4722                         bp->rx_skb_func = bnxt_rx_page_skb;
 4723                 }





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux