Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: Document netmem driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/17/2024 12:12 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:

Document expectations from drivers looking to add support for device
memory tcp or other netmem based features.

Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx>

---

v5 (forked from the merged series):
- Describe benefits of netmem (Shannon).
- Specify that netmem is for payload pages (Jakub).
- Clarify what  recycling the driver can do (Jakub).
- Clarify why the driver needs to use DMA_SYNC and DMA_MAP pp flags
   (Shannon).

v4:
- Address comments from Randy.
- Change docs to netmem focus (Jakub).
- Address comments from Jakub.

---
  Documentation/networking/index.rst  |  1 +
  Documentation/networking/netmem.rst | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/netmem.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/index.rst b/Documentation/networking/index.rst
index 46c178e564b3..058193ed2eeb 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/index.rst
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ Contents:
     netdevices
     netfilter-sysctl
     netif-msg
+   netmem
     nexthop-group-resilient
     nf_conntrack-sysctl
     nf_flowtable
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst b/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7de21ddb5412
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==================================
+Netmem Support for Network Drivers
+==================================
+
+This document outlines the requirements for network drivers to support netmem,
+an abstract memory type that enables features like device memory TCP. By
+supporting netmem, drivers can work with various underlying memory types
+with little to no modification.
+
+Benefits of Netmem :
+
+* Flexibility: Netmem can be backed by different memory types (e.g., struct
+  page, DMA-buf), allowing drivers to support various use cases such as device
+  memory TCP.
+* Future-proof: Drivers with netmem support are ready for upcoming
+  features that rely on it.
+* Simplified Development: Drivers interact with a consistent API,
+  regardless of the underlying memory implementation.
+
+Driver Requirements
+===================
+
+1. The driver must support page_pool.
+
+2. The driver must support the tcp-data-split ethtool option.
+
+3. The driver must use the page_pool netmem APIs for payload memory. The netmem
+   APIs currently 1-to-1 correspond with page APIs. Conversion to netmem should
+   be achievable by switching the page APIs to netmem APIs and tracking memory
+   via netmem_refs in the driver rather than struct page * :
+
+   - page_pool_alloc -> page_pool_alloc_netmem
+   - page_pool_get_dma_addr -> page_pool_get_dma_addr_netmem
+   - page_pool_put_page -> page_pool_put_netmem
+
+   Not all page APIs have netmem equivalents at the moment. If your driver
+   relies on a missing netmem API, feel free to add and propose to netdev@, or
+   reach out to the maintainers and/or almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx for help adding
+   the netmem API.
+
+4. The driver must use the following PP_FLAGS:
+
+   - PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP: netmem is not dma-mappable by the driver. The driver
+     must delegate the dma mapping to the page_pool, which knows when
+     dma-mapping is (or is not) appropriate.
+   - PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV: netmem dma addr is not necessarily dma-syncable
+     by the driver. The driver must delegate the dma syncing to the page_pool,
+     which knows when dma-syncing is (or is not) appropriate.
+   - PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM. The driver must specify this flag iff
+     tcp-data-split is enabled.
+
+5. The driver must not assume the netmem is readable and/or backed by pages.
+   The netmem returned by the page_pool may be unreadable, in which case
+   netmem_address() will return NULL. The driver must correctly handle
+   unreadable netmem, i.e. don't attempt to handle its contents when
+   netmem_address() is NULL.
+
+   Ideally, drivers should not have to check the underlying netmem type via
+   helpers like netmem_is_net_iov() or convert the netmem to any of its
+   underlying types via netmem_to_page() or netmem_to_net_iov(). In most cases,
+   netmem or page_pool helpers that abstract this complexity are provided
+   (and more can be added).
+
+6. The driver must use page_pool_dma_sync_netmem_for_cpu() in lieu of
+   dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(). For some memory providers, dma_syncing for
+   CPU will be done by the page_pool, for others (particularly dmabuf memory
+   provider), dma syncing for CPU is the responsibility of the userspace using
+   dmabuf APIs. The driver must delegate the entire dma-syncing operation to
+   the page_pool which will do it correctly.
+
+7. Avoid implementing driver-specific recycling on top of the page_pool. Drivers
+   cannot hold onto a struct page to do their own recycling as the netmem may
+   not be backed by a struct page. However, you may hold onto a page_pool
+   reference with page_pool_fragment_netmem() or page_pool_ref_netmem() for
+   that purpose, but be mindful that some netmem types might have longer
+   circulation times, such as when userspace holds a reference in zerocopy
+   scenarios.
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog



Thanks for the updates, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@xxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux