Test contended "wait-for-all" waits, to make sure that scheduling and wakeup logic works correctly, and that the wait only exits once objects are all simultaneously signaled. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- .../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c index 993f5db23768..b77fb0b2c4b1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c @@ -706,4 +706,102 @@ TEST(wake_any) close(fd); } +TEST(wake_all) +{ + struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args = {0}; + struct ntsync_wait_args wait_args = {0}; + struct ntsync_sem_args sem_args = {0}; + struct wait_args thread_args; + int objs[2], fd, ret; + __u32 count, index; + pthread_t thread; + + fd = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY); + ASSERT_LE(0, fd); + + sem_args.count = 0; + sem_args.max = 3; + sem_args.sem = 0xdeadbeef; + ret = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_SEM, &sem_args); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_NE(0xdeadbeef, sem_args.sem); + + mutex_args.owner = 123; + mutex_args.count = 1; + mutex_args.mutex = 0xdeadbeef; + ret = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_NE(0xdeadbeef, mutex_args.mutex); + + objs[0] = sem_args.sem; + objs[1] = mutex_args.mutex; + + wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(1000); + wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)objs; + wait_args.count = 2; + wait_args.owner = 456; + thread_args.fd = fd; + thread_args.args = &wait_args; + thread_args.request = NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ALL; + ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, wait_thread, &thread_args); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + + ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100); + EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, ret); + + count = 1; + ret = post_sem(sem_args.sem, &count); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(0, count); + + ret = pthread_tryjoin_np(thread, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(EBUSY, ret); + + check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 1, 3); + + ret = wait_any(fd, 1, &sem_args.sem, 123, &index); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(0, index); + + ret = unlock_mutex(mutex_args.mutex, 123, &count); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(1, count); + + ret = pthread_tryjoin_np(thread, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(EBUSY, ret); + + check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 0, 0); + + count = 2; + ret = post_sem(sem_args.sem, &count); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(0, count); + check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 1, 3); + check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 1, 456); + + ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(0, thread_args.ret); + + /* delete an object while it's being waited on */ + + wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(200); + wait_args.owner = 123; + ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, wait_thread, &thread_args); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + + ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100); + EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, ret); + + close(sem_args.sem); + close(mutex_args.mutex); + + ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 200); + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, thread_args.ret); + EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, thread_args.err); + + close(fd); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN -- 2.45.2