On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:26 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 11/7/24 2:25 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > >> If we really want to separate the mechanics of kernel development from > >> the associated process information - not always an easy separation, IMO > >> - we could make a top-level "development" directory, put a lot of the > >> other relevant stuff there, and include the debugging stuff. It seems > >> really weird to put debugging by itself, though; it's only part of the > >> picture. > > > > I could go with that. > > > >> > >> Why is Documentation/process so bad? > > > > Documentation/process/ is meta-documentation about kernel social "standards" > > among other things. It is "soft" documentation, whereas debugging (IMHO) is > > "hard" documentation. > > > > But hey, it's all your baby. Do whatever pleases you. :) > > Hopefully not all mine...:) > > My suggestion is to put it under process for now just to not block > forward progress on this work. We can surely relocate it if we want to > make a proper development-processes top-level directory in the future. > > Thanks, > > jon Hi Jonathan, I wanted to check with you regarding the timing for sending the patch. Should I go ahead and submit an updated version after relocating it under the process/debugging section?
