On 12/4/2024 10:43 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 09:13:43AM +1100, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote: >> Based on our discussions, we implemented significant changes. We essentially >> rewrote most of the files and altered the overall direction, except for a >> couple of files. The changelog entry would have been extensive. > > At least some changelog should be provided, even if tells "reworked to > use TEE framework, made it jump over the head and tie the shoelaces". > Sure, I'll provide some changelog. > Also please don't top-post, this style is frowned upon in the mailing > list discussions, it breaks the logic of reading. > ;) Oops, that shouldn't have been sent out like this. My apologies. I'll ensure it doesn't happen again.. - Amir >> >> - Amir >> >> On 12/3/2024 5:06 PM, Trilok Soni wrote: >>> On 12/2/2024 8:19 PM, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote: >>>> This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) >>>> driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs) >>>> and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where >>>> each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke >>>> these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other >>>> objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object >>>> that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services. >>> >>> The first patch series was RFC and now you had removed the RFC. Can you please >>> provide the reasons? >>> >>> https://lwn.net/ml/all/20240702-qcom-tee-object-and-ioctls-v1-0-633c3ddf57ee@xxxxxxxxxxx/ >>> >>> I understand that you have now changed to tee framework but I want to check >>> if we should continue with the version and increment here or start from [00]? >>> >
