On 02.12.24 17:17, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:54:49 +0100 > Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: >> On 02.12.24 15:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100 >>> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: >>>> On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>>>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100 >>>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: >>>>>>> +Tagging people requires permission >>>>>>> +---------------------------------- >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:, >>>>>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions: >>>>> >>>>> Requested-by: >>>>> >>>>> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1. >>>>> >>>>> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to >>>>> be added on a patch series. >>> [...] >>> You're basically requesting explicit permission for any "non-official" >>> tags as well, including reviewed-by. This is not what it is wanted here. >> >> I could easily use a slightly modified phrase like "...as all >> mentioned above except...". > > It seems a lot better to me. I went with this a slightly different variant for readability: Be careful in the addition of the aforementioned tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:, Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named. Hope that's okay. If I don't hear anything, I'll assume your earlier Reviewed-by: is still valid. Ciao, Thorsten
