On 12/2/24 10:09, Amit Shah wrote: > I can still include the summary of the discussion in this patch - I > just feel it isn't necessary with the rework. It's necessary. There's a new hardware feature. You want it to replace a software sequence in certain situations. You have to make an actual, coherent argument argument as to why the hardware feature is a suitable replacement. For instance (and I'm pretty sure we've gone over this more than once), the changelog here still makes the claim that a "context switch" and a "mov-to-CR3" are the same thing.
