> > Hi, > > On 05/12/2013, at 7:49 PM, Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:44:13PM +1100, Daniel Tang wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 05/12/2013, at 12:44 AM, Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> lsi is vendor name, what are zevio and nspire? > >>> Usually, the compatible string should be "vendor_name,soc_name- > module_name" > >>> > >> > >> Because this port uses documentation from reverse engineering, it's > difficult to work out what is SoC specific and what is device specific. > The SoC is Zevio but the driver is written for the TI-Nspire. > >> > > > > Please wrap the line to 80 characters. > > > > The driver is written for the TI-Nspire, and you port this driver for > > SoC Zevio platform? > > The TI-Nspire runs on the Zevio SoC. > > > Since you use chipidea ip, we don't care the usb > > module name at your platform, we only care the soc name which you are > > running, it can detect the SoC platform at runtime. > > > > Yep, that's why the latest patch I sent in renames the device tree > binding to "lsi,zevio-usb" since zevio is the name of the SoC that the > TI-Nspire uses. > > > At your dts patch, it still uses nspire-usb. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138614886720024&w=2 > > I'll send a new one in right now. OK, in order to avoid changing name again, I will queue your patch at my pending chipidea tree until your dts has applied by arch or dts maintainer, notify me when they are ready. Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
