Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/Documentation: Update algo in init_size description of boot protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 09:45:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 11/25/24 12:31 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > -	if (relocatable_kernel)
> > > -	runtime_start = align_up(load_address, kernel_alignment)
> > > -	else
> > > -	runtime_start = pref_address
> > > +    if ( relocatable_kernel ) {
> > > +      if ( load_address < pref_address )
> > 
> > What's up with the extra spaces around ( and ) ... and inconsistent with
> > the lines below?

I can remove them. This file has a lot of inconsistencies it seems...

> Also, even pseudocode should follow the kernel's coding style and use 
> tabs in particular - which it already does in (some...) other places of 
> this document, such as the 'Sample Boot Configuration' chapter.

The problem is that reStructuredText syntax requires that indentation.
I may follow the rules after the rST requirements, though.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux