[PATCH RFC net-next v3 15/27] regulator: core: Resolve supply using of_node from regulator_config

[Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Previously, the regulator core resolved its supply only from the parent
device or its children, ignoring the of_node specified in the
regulator_config structure.
This behavior causes issues in scenarios where multiple regulator devices
are registered for components described as children of a controller, each
with their own specific regulator supply.

For instance, in a PSE controller with multiple PIs (Power Interfaces),
each PI may have a distinct regulator supply. However, the regulator core
would incorrectly use the PSE controller node or its first child to look up
the regulator supply, rather than the node specified by the
regulator_config->of_node for the PI.

This update modifies the behavior to prioritize the of_node in
regulator_config for resolving the supply. This ensures correct resolution
of the power supply for each device. If no supply is found in the provided
of_node, the core falls back to searching within the parent device as
before.

Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
It is weird that it wasn't seen before, maybe there was not any case
were it can't find the supply_name from the parent device.

Changes in v3:
- New patch
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 2948a7eca734..b49f751893b9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1936,6 +1936,20 @@ static struct regulator_dev *regulator_lookup_by_name(const char *name)
 	return dev ? dev_to_rdev(dev) : NULL;
 }
 
+static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dt_lookup(struct device *dev,
+						 const char *supply)
+{
+	struct regulator_dev *r = NULL;
+
+	if (dev && dev->of_node) {
+		r = of_regulator_dev_lookup(dev, supply);
+		if (PTR_ERR(r) == -ENODEV)
+			r = NULL;
+	}
+
+	return r;
+}
+
 /**
  * regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device.
  * @dev: device for regulator "consumer".
@@ -1960,16 +1974,9 @@ static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
 	regulator_supply_alias(&dev, &supply);
 
 	/* first do a dt based lookup */
-	if (dev && dev->of_node) {
-		r = of_regulator_dev_lookup(dev, supply);
-		if (!IS_ERR(r))
-			return r;
-		if (PTR_ERR(r) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			return r;
-
-		if (PTR_ERR(r) == -ENODEV)
-			r = NULL;
-	}
+	r = regulator_dt_lookup(dev, supply);
+	if (r)
+		return r;
 
 	/* if not found, try doing it non-dt way */
 	if (dev)
@@ -2002,8 +2009,8 @@ static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
 
 static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
-	struct regulator_dev *r;
 	struct device *dev = rdev->dev.parent;
+	struct regulator_dev *r = NULL;
 	struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -2015,7 +2022,18 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	if (rdev->supply)
 		return 0;
 
-	r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, rdev->supply_name);
+	/* first do a dt based lookup on the node described in the virtual
+	 * device.
+	 */
+	if (rdev->dev.of_node)
+		r = regulator_dt_lookup(&rdev->dev, rdev->supply_name);
+
+	/* If regulator not found use usual search path in the parent
+	 * device.
+	 */
+	if (!r)
+		r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, rdev->supply_name);
+
 	if (IS_ERR(r)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(r);
 

-- 
2.34.1