Originally attempted partially in [1], the missing binding were reported as part of Rob's report in [2]. So, here is take two of the series, lacking an standard causes issues that was fixed such as [3]. Ideally, we should never again introduce a board file without a exact compatible SoC match. I have stayed a bit away from updating board and SoC dts files yet to look at the direction we'd like to go here. If we feel things are good, I would gladly try to clean our mess up. Nishanth Menon (2): Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 7 +++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2998201/ [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138378029113665&w=2 [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3279281/ -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
