Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] leds: Add LED1202 I2C driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 18/11/2024 à 15:54, Vicentiu Galanopulo a écrit :
The output current can be adjusted separately for each channel by 8-bit
analog (current sink input) and 12-bit digital (PWM) dimming control. The
LED1202 implements 12 low-side current generators with independent dimming
control.
Internal volatile memory allows the user to store up to 8 different patterns,
each pattern is a particular output configuration in terms of PWM
duty-cycle (on 4096 steps). Analog dimming (on 256 steps) is per channel but
common to all patterns. Each device tree LED node will have a corresponding
entry in /sys/class/leds with the label name. The brightness property
corresponds to the per channel analog dimming, while the patterns[1-8] to the
PWM dimming control.

Signed-off-by: Vicentiu Galanopulo <vicentiu.galanopulo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...

+static int st1202_write_reg(struct st1202_chip *chip, int reg, uint8_t val)
+{
+	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(chip->client, reg, val);
+}

Many duplicated message could be saved if errors where logged directly in st1202_write_reg() and st1202_read_reg()

This would simplify a lot the callers that would only need to return directly.

+
+static uint8_t st1202_prescalar_to_miliseconds(unsigned int value)
+{
+	return value/ST1202_MILLIS_PATTERN_DUR_MIN - 1;

Can value be 0?
If yes, should the return value be clamped?

+}

...

+static int st1202_dt_init(struct st1202_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &chip->client->dev;
+	struct st1202_led *led;
+	int err, reg;
+
+	for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(dev_of_node(dev), child) {
+		struct led_init_data init_data = {};
+
+		err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
+		if (err) {
+			of_node_put(child);

The _scoped version of the iterator is used, so I think that this of_node_put() is not needed.

+			return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Invalid register, error: %d\n", err);

No need to duplicate err. dev_err_probe() already prints it, in a human readble form.

+		}
+
+		led = &chip->leds[reg];
+		led->is_active = true;
+		led->fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(child);
+
+		led->led_cdev.max_brightness = U8_MAX;
+		led->led_cdev.brightness_set_blocking = st1202_led_set;
+		led->led_cdev.pattern_set = st1202_led_pattern_set;
+		led->led_cdev.pattern_clear = st1202_led_pattern_clear;
+		led->led_cdev.default_trigger = "pattern";
+
+		init_data.fwnode = led->fwnode;
+		init_data.devicename = "st1202";
+		init_data.default_label = ":";
+		err = devm_led_classdev_register_ext(dev,
+					&led->led_cdev, &init_data);
+		if (err < 0) {
+			dev_err_probe(dev, err,
+				"Failed to register LED class dev, error: %d\n", err);

No need to duplicate err. dev_err_probe() already prints it, in a human readble form.

Also return dev_err_probe() would save a few lines.

+			return err;
+		}
+		led->led_cdev.brightness_set = st1202_brightness_set;
+		led->led_cdev.brightness_get = st1202_brightness_get;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st1202_setup(struct st1202_chip *chip)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);

if guard(mutex)(&chip->lock); was used you could return directly in all error paths below.

Same applies in several functions above.

+	/*
+	 * Once the supply voltage is applied, the LED1202 executes some internal checks,
+	 * afterwords it stops the oscillator and puts the internal LDO in quiescent mode.
+	 * To start the device, EN bit must be set inside the “Device Enable” register at
+	 * address 01h. As soon as EN is set, the LED1202 loads the adjustment parameters
+	 * from the internal non-volatile memory and performs an auto-calibration procedure
+	 * in order to increase the output current precision.
+	 * Such initialization lasts about 6.5 ms.
+	 */
+
+	/* Reset the chip during setup */
+	ret = st1202_write_reg(chip, ST1202_DEV_ENABLE, ST1202_DEV_ENABLE_RESET);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(&chip->client->dev, -EIO,
+				"Failed to write to register [0x%x], error: %d\n",
+				ST1202_DEV_ENABLE, ret);

Why return -EIO if you have an error code in ret?
If you return ret, the ", error: %d\n", ret" part can be removed

Same everywhere in this function

+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+	/* Enable phase-shift delay feature */
+	ret = st1202_write_reg(chip, ST1202_CONFIG_REG, ST1202_CONFIG_REG_SHFT);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(&chip->client->dev, -EIO,
+				"Failed to write to register [0x%x], error: %d\n",
+				ST1202_CONFIG_REG, ret);
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+	/* Enable the device */
+	ret = st1202_write_reg(chip, ST1202_DEV_ENABLE, ST1202_DEV_ENABLE_ON);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(&chip->client->dev, -EIO,
+				"Failed to write to register [0x%x], error: %d\n",
+				ST1202_DEV_ENABLE, ret);
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+	/* Duration of initialization */
+	usleep_range(6500, 10000);
+
+	/* Deactivate all LEDS (channels) and activate only the ones found in Device Tree */
+	ret = st1202_write_reg(chip, ST1202_CHAN_ENABLE_LOW, ST1202_CHAN_DISABLE_ALL);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(&chip->client->dev, -EIO,
+				"Failed writing to register [0x%x], error: %d\n",
+				ST1202_CHAN_ENABLE_LOW, ret);
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+	ret = st1202_write_reg(chip, ST1202_CHAN_ENABLE_HIGH, ST1202_CHAN_DISABLE_ALL);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(&chip->client->dev, -EIO,
+				"Failed writing to register [0x%x], error: %d\n",
+				ST1202_CHAN_ENABLE_HIGH, ret);
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+	ret = st1202_write_reg(chip, ST1202_CONFIG_REG,
+				ST1202_CONFIG_REG_PATS | ST1202_CONFIG_REG_PATSR);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(&chip->client->dev, -EIO,
+				"Failed writing to register [0x%lx], error: %d\n",
+				ST1202_CONFIG_REG_PATS | ST1202_CONFIG_REG_PATSR, ret);
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+exit:
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int st1202_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct st1202_chip *chip;
+	struct st1202_led *led;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
+		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EIO, "SMBUS Byte Data not Supported\n");
+
+	chip = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!chip)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);

Is it needed?
(There is no i2c_get_clientdata())

+
+	devm_mutex_init(&client->dev, &chip->lock);
+	chip->client = client;
+
+	ret = st1202_dt_init(chip);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = st1202_setup(chip);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < ST1202_MAX_LEDS; i++) {
+		led = &chip->leds[i];
+		led->chip = chip;
+		led->led_num = i;
+
+		if (led->is_active) {
+			ret = st1202_channel_set(led->chip, led->led_num, true);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EIO,
+					"Failed to activate LED channel, error: %d\n", ret);
+			}

Why return -EIO if you have an error code in ret?
If you return ret, the ", error: %d\n", ret" part can be removed

Also some { } could be removed.

+
+			ret = st1202_led_pattern_clear(&led->led_cdev);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EIO,
+					"Failed to clear LED pattern, error: %d\n", ret);

Why return -EIO if you have an error code in ret?
If you return ret, the ", error: %d\n", ret" part can be removed

Also some { } could be removed.

+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id st1202_id[] = {
+	{ "st1202-i2c" },
+	{ /* sentinel */ },

Nitpick: no need for ending comma after a terminator

+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st1202_id);
+
+static const struct of_device_id st1202_dt_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,led1202", },
+	{ /* sentinel */ },

Nitpick: no need for ending comma after a terminator

+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st1202_dt_ids);
...

CJ




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux