Re: [PATCH v3] docs: bug-bisect: add a note about bisecting -next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Explicitly mention how to bisect -next, as nothing in the kernel tree
> currently explains that bisects between -next versions won't work well
> and it's better to bisect between mainline and -next.
>
> Co-developed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3
> - add a optional 'that' for readability/understandability
>
> v2:
> - slightly change patch descption
> - make the text more how-toish to better match the rest of the document
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241022-doc-bisect-next-v1-1-196c0a60d554@xxxxxxxxxx/
> - initial release
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/bug-bisect.rst | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

Applied, thanks.

jon




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux