On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 02:50:45PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 11/11/24 13:07, Simona Vetter wrote: > > Personal take, but I think a forced public apology as the primary or at > > least initial coc enforcement approach is one of the worst. ... > This document isn't intended to be a complete summary of all actions the > CoC takes in response to reports. There is a lot of back and forth with > the individuals to bring about change before the CoC asks for an apology. I guess it would be good to explicitly call out (possibly in an incremental change on top of this one) that the specific enforcement steps here are examples, and are mainly for cases where a more mediation/education based approach fails or extreme cases where they're inappropriate? Neither the existing document nor the current change make that explicit (at least to my reading), it's clear from for example the reports that are sent that the existing practice is to try to use those approaches first but I'm not sure that people would realise that from this document alone.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
