[I suspect that your HTML email will keep your response off the list -
don't do that.]
anish kumar <yesanishhere@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> anish kumar <yesanishhere@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > +In the above struct, dai’s are registered using names but you can pass
> > +either dai name or device tree node but not both. Also, names used here
> > +for cpu/codec/platform dais should be globally unique.
> > +
> > +Additionaly below example macro can be used to register cpu, codec and
> > +platform dai::
> > +
> > +SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(wm2200_cpu_dsp,
> > + DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CPU("samsung-i2s.0")),
> > + DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("spi0.0", "wm0010-sdi1")),
> > + DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_PLATFORM("samsung-i2s.0")));
> > +
>
> This will not give you the literal block you were hoping for. Please
> actually build the docs after making changes and look at the results.
>
> I was not hoping for literally code block but rather just a tab. I just pasted Bagas comment as I
> thought it is better way to say that about the change.
The "::" you added above introduces a literal block. Yes, that is what
you were hoping for.
jon
