On 28/10/24 - 07:17, Maíra Canal wrote: > Hi Louis, > > On 28/10/24 06:50, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > On 26/10/24 - 09:10, Maíra Canal wrote: > > > Hi Louis, > > > > > > On 14/10/24 05:39, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > > On 11/10/24 - 10:53, Maira Canal wrote: > > > > > Hi Louis, > > > > > > > > > > On 10/11/24 06:36, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Until this point, this series has not received any major comments since > > > > > > v9. I will commit patches 1-9 next week if there are no further comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Although we are maintainers of VKMS, it isn't recommended that we push > > > > > our own changes without even the Ack of another person. Please, read the > > > > > "drm-misc Committer Guidelines" [1]. > > > > > > > > Hi Maíra, Maxime, > > > > > > > > I apologize for this rushed commit request. I sent the initial email with > > > > a delay before the commit action because I was not sure about the > > > > procedure and wanted to give others a chance to raise any concerns. > > > > Unfortunately, I overlooked the need to collect an Ack/Review for each > > > > patch, even when there hadn't been any responses for several months. I'm > > > > sorry for this oversight. > > > > > > > > > I can ack patches 05/15, 07/15, and 09/15, but it would be more > > > > > beneficial for the community if you ask for an ack (from me or from the > > > > > DRM maintainers, which are always around), instead of saying that you > > > > > are going to commit the patches without any review. > > > > > > > > I will be happy to ask for acknowledgments if needed, but as you mentioned > > > > multiple times: nobody is paid to maintain VKMS. Since you did not comment > > > > these series since July, when you told me you would review my patches, I > > > > assumed it was either okay or you no longer had the time to maintain > > > > (which I completely understand). > > > > > > Yeah, I'm a volunteer and no longer have time to maintain VKMS. A couple > > > of weeks ago I sent a patch removing myself as VKMS maintainer. This > > > doesn't imply that patches can be pushed without review. > > > > I will acked-by and push your patch, it will be an easy "first commit". If > > I do something wrong during the process, please tell me. > > > > Thanks for this precision, I understood this, and I will not push without > > reviews, don't worry! > > > > Thanks a lot for all your reviews! > > > We are a community with several active developers. Although I don't have > > > time to properly review your patches, you can try to gather other > > > developers to review your patches. You can try to use #dri-devel to get > > > reviewers. > > > > Thanks for the tip, I will do this! > > > > > That said, you can add my ACK to patches 05/15, 07/15, and 09/15 and > > > push the patches. I won't ack the YUV patches as I don't feel > > > comfortable reviewing/acking those. > > > > Perfect for the patches 1..9, it will be a very nice step forward and will > > reduce my conflicts a lot with the rest of my work! > > >> Acked-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > BTW if the patches are fixing IGT tests, please update the list of fails > > > and skips on DRM CI. > > > > For this, how should I do? Commit the series and wait for the bot results? > > Run tests on my computer (I only have a x86 VM)? Is there some doc > > somewhere? > > Check [1] for instructions on how to run the CI on GitLab. > > [1] https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/automated_testing.html Thanks for the link! I am stuck at the first step, do I need to ask some right to create a repo on git.freedesktop.org? I don't see any button to create a repo, and I can't fork any existing kernel repo. I also asked the access to CI-OK. Thanks, Louis Chauvet > Best Regards, > - Maíra > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Louis Chauvet > > > > > Best Regards, > > > - Maíra > > > > > > > > > > > So, I hereby formally request reviews/ACKs for the following series: > > > > > > > > [this series]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241007-yuv-v12-0-01c1ada6fec8@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > [2]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241007-b4-new-color-formats-v2-0-d47da50d4674@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > [3]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240516-writeback_line_by_line-v1-0-7b2e3bf9f1c9@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > (I have to send a v2 for [3] because of rebase conflict, but nothing else > > > > changed) > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > > Louis Chauvet > > > > > [1] https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/committer/committer-drm-misc.html > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > - Maíra > > > > > > > > > > > For patches 10-15, I am currently waiting for feedback from Maxime to > > > > > > send the next iteration with a fix for kunit tests. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Louis Chauvet > > > > > > > > > > > > On 07/10/24 - 18:10, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > > > > > As all the rotation are now supported by VKMS, this simplification does > > > > > > > not make sense anymore, so remove it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c | 7 +------ > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c > > > > > > > index 8875bed76410..5a028ee96c91 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c > > > > > > > @@ -115,12 +115,7 @@ static void vkms_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane, > > > > > > > frame_info->fb = fb; > > > > > > > memcpy(&frame_info->map, &shadow_plane_state->data, sizeof(frame_info->map)); > > > > > > > drm_framebuffer_get(frame_info->fb); > > > > > > > - frame_info->rotation = drm_rotation_simplify(new_state->rotation, DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | > > > > > > > - DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 | > > > > > > > - DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270 | > > > > > > > - DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | > > > > > > > - DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y); > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > + frame_info->rotation = new_state->rotation; > > > > > > > vkms_plane_state->pixel_read_line = get_pixel_read_line_function(fmt); > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 2.46.2 > > > > > > > >
