On 10/23/2024 11:24 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index b9b82aaea9a3..3830084b569b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ struct kvm_queued_exception {
u32 error_code;
unsigned long payload;
bool has_payload;
+ bool nested;
u64 event_data;
how "nested" is migrated in live migration?
Damn, I forgot it!
Looks we need to add it to kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_{get,set}_vcpu_events(),
but the real question is how to add it to struct kvm_vcpu_events.
};
[..]
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index d81144bd648f..03f42b218554 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1910,8 +1910,11 @@ void vmx_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INSTRUCTION_LEN,
vmx->vcpu.arch.event_exit_inst_len);
intr_info |= INTR_TYPE_SOFT_EXCEPTION;
- } else
+ } else {
intr_info |= INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION;
+ if (ex->nested)
+ intr_info |= INTR_INFO_NESTED_EXCEPTION_MASK;
how about moving the is_fred_enable() check from kvm_multiple_exception() to here? i.e.,
if (ex->nested && is_fred_enabled(vcpu))
intr_info |= INTR_INFO_NESTED_EXCEPTION_MASK;
It is slightly clearer because FRED details don't bleed into kvm_multiple_exception().
But FRED is all about events, including exception/interrupt/trap/...
logically VMX nested exception only works when FRED is enabled, see how
it is set at 2 places in kvm_multiple_exception().
+ }
vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD, intr_info);
@@ -7290,6 +7293,7 @@ static void __vmx_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
kvm_requeue_exception(vcpu, vector,
idt_vectoring_info & VECTORING_INFO_DELIVER_CODE_MASK,
error_code,
+ idt_vectoring_info & VECTORING_INFO_NESTED_EXCEPTION_MASK,
event_data);
break;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7a55c1eb5297..8546629166e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -874,6 +874,11 @@ static void kvm_multiple_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int nr,
vcpu->arch.exception.pending = true;
vcpu->arch.exception.injected = false;
+ vcpu->arch.exception.nested = vcpu->arch.exception.nested ||
+ (is_fred_enabled(vcpu) &&
+ (vcpu->arch.nmi_injected ||
+ vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected));
+
vcpu->arch.exception.has_error_code = has_error;
vcpu->arch.exception.vector = nr;
vcpu->arch.exception.error_code = error_code;
@@ -903,8 +908,13 @@ static void kvm_multiple_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int nr,
vcpu->arch.exception.injected = false;
vcpu->arch.exception.pending = false;
+ /* #DF is NOT a nested event, per its definition. */
+ vcpu->arch.exception.nested = false;
+
kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, DF_VECTOR, 0);
} else {
+ vcpu->arch.exception.nested = is_fred_enabled(vcpu);
+
/* replace previous exception with a new one in a hope
that instruction re-execution will regenerate lost
exception */