Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] memcg-v1: remove memcg move locking code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 24-10-24 18:23:03, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The memcg v1's charge move feature has been deprecated. All the places
> using the memcg move lock, have stopped using it as they don't need the
> protection any more. Let's proceed to remove all the locking code
> related to charge moving.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>

Thank you for restructuring this. Having all callers gone by now
certainly makes this much safer and easier to review.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
> Changes since RFC:
> - Remove the memcg move locking in separate patches.
> 
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 54 -------------------------
>  mm/filemap.c               |  1 -
>  mm/memcontrol-v1.c         | 82 --------------------------------------
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |  5 ---
>  mm/rmap.c                  |  1 -
>  5 files changed, 143 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 798db70b0a30..932534291ca2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -299,20 +299,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  	/* For oom notifier event fd */
>  	struct list_head oom_notify;
>  
> -	/* taken only while moving_account > 0 */
> -	spinlock_t move_lock;
> -	unsigned long move_lock_flags;
> -
>  	/* Legacy tcp memory accounting */
>  	bool tcpmem_active;
>  	int tcpmem_pressure;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * set > 0 if pages under this cgroup are moving to other cgroup.
> -	 */
> -	atomic_t moving_account;
> -	struct task_struct *move_lock_task;
> -
>  	/* List of events which userspace want to receive */
>  	struct list_head event_list;
>  	spinlock_t event_list_lock;
> @@ -428,9 +418,7 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup *__folio_objcg(struct folio *folio)
>   *
>   * - the folio lock
>   * - LRU isolation
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
>   * - exclusive reference
> - * - mem_cgroup_trylock_pages()
>   *
>   * For a kmem folio a caller should hold an rcu read lock to protect memcg
>   * associated with a kmem folio from being released.
> @@ -499,9 +487,7 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *folio_memcg_rcu(struct folio *folio)
>   *
>   * - the folio lock
>   * - LRU isolation
> - * - lock_folio_memcg()
>   * - exclusive reference
> - * - mem_cgroup_trylock_pages()
>   *
>   * For a kmem folio a caller should hold an rcu read lock to protect memcg
>   * associated with a kmem folio from being released.
> @@ -1873,26 +1859,6 @@ static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
>  	return p->memcg_in_oom;
>  }
>  
> -void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio);
> -void folio_memcg_unlock(struct folio *folio);
> -
> -/* try to stablize folio_memcg() for all the pages in a memcg */
> -static inline bool mem_cgroup_trylock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -
> -	if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !atomic_read(&memcg->moving_account))
> -		return true;
> -
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mem_cgroup_unlock_pages(void)
> -{
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_enter_user_fault(void)
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(current->in_user_fault);
> @@ -1914,26 +1880,6 @@ unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static inline void folio_memcg_unlock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool mem_cgroup_trylock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> -	/* to match folio_memcg_rcu() */
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mem_cgroup_unlock_pages(void)
> -{
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
>  	return false;
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 630a1c431ea1..e582a1545d2a 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@
>   *    ->i_pages lock		(folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty)
>   *    bdi.wb->list_lock		(folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty)
>   *    ->inode->i_lock		(folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty)
> - *    ->memcg->move_lock	(folio_remove_rmap_pte->folio_memcg_lock)
>   *    bdi.wb->list_lock		(zap_pte_range->set_page_dirty)
>   *    ->inode->i_lock		(zap_pte_range->set_page_dirty)
>   *    ->private_lock		(zap_pte_range->block_dirty_folio)
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> index 9c0fba8c8a83..539ceefa9d2d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> @@ -401,87 +401,6 @@ unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  	return nr_reclaimed;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * folio_memcg_lock - Bind a folio to its memcg.
> - * @folio: The folio.
> - *
> - * This function prevents unlocked LRU folios from being moved to
> - * another cgroup.
> - *
> - * It ensures lifetime of the bound memcg.  The caller is responsible
> - * for the lifetime of the folio.
> - */
> -void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> -	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * The RCU lock is held throughout the transaction.  The fast
> -	 * path can get away without acquiring the memcg->move_lock
> -	 * because page moving starts with an RCU grace period.
> -         */
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -
> -	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> -		return;
> -again:
> -	memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
> -	if (unlikely(!memcg))
> -		return;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> -	might_lock(&memcg->move_lock);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> -#endif
> -
> -	if (atomic_read(&memcg->moving_account) <= 0)
> -		return;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&memcg->move_lock, flags);
> -	if (memcg != folio_memcg(folio)) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, flags);
> -		goto again;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * When charge migration first begins, we can have multiple
> -	 * critical sections holding the fast-path RCU lock and one
> -	 * holding the slowpath move_lock. Track the task who has the
> -	 * move_lock for folio_memcg_unlock().
> -	 */
> -	memcg->move_lock_task = current;
> -	memcg->move_lock_flags = flags;
> -}
> -
> -static void __folio_memcg_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> -	if (memcg && memcg->move_lock_task == current) {
> -		unsigned long flags = memcg->move_lock_flags;
> -
> -		memcg->move_lock_task = NULL;
> -		memcg->move_lock_flags = 0;
> -
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, flags);
> -	}
> -
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * folio_memcg_unlock - Release the binding between a folio and its memcg.
> - * @folio: The folio.
> - *
> - * This releases the binding created by folio_memcg_lock().  This does
> - * not change the accounting of this folio to its memcg, but it does
> - * permit others to change it.
> - */
> -void folio_memcg_unlock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> -	__folio_memcg_unlock(folio_memcg(folio));
> -}
> -
>  static u64 mem_cgroup_move_charge_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
>  				struct cftype *cft)
>  {
> @@ -1189,7 +1108,6 @@ void memcg1_memcg_init(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->oom_notify);
>  	mutex_init(&memcg->thresholds_lock);
> -	spin_lock_init(&memcg->move_lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->event_list);
>  	spin_lock_init(&memcg->event_list_lock);
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 94279b9c766a..3c223aaeb6af 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,6 @@ void lruvec_memcg_debug(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
>   * These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions:
>   * - folio locked
>   * - folio_test_lru false
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
>   * - folio frozen (refcount of 0)
>   *
>   * Return: The lruvec this folio is on with its lock held.
> @@ -1211,7 +1210,6 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock(struct folio *folio)
>   * These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions:
>   * - folio locked
>   * - folio_test_lru false
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
>   * - folio frozen (refcount of 0)
>   *
>   * Return: The lruvec this folio is on with its lock held and interrupts
> @@ -1235,7 +1233,6 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock_irq(struct folio *folio)
>   * These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions:
>   * - folio locked
>   * - folio_test_lru false
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
>   * - folio frozen (refcount of 0)
>   *
>   * Return: The lruvec this folio is on with its lock held and interrupts
> @@ -2375,9 +2372,7 @@ static void commit_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  	 *
>  	 * - the page lock
>  	 * - LRU isolation
> -	 * - folio_memcg_lock()
>  	 * - exclusive reference
> -	 * - mem_cgroup_trylock_pages()
>  	 */
>  	folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)memcg;
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 4785a693857a..c6c4d4ea29a7 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
>   *                   swap_lock (in swap_duplicate, swap_info_get)
>   *                     mmlist_lock (in mmput, drain_mmlist and others)
>   *                     mapping->private_lock (in block_dirty_folio)
> - *                       folio_lock_memcg move_lock (in block_dirty_folio)
>   *                         i_pages lock (widely used)
>   *                           lruvec->lru_lock (in folio_lruvec_lock_irq)
>   *                     inode->i_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty)
> -- 
> 2.43.5

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux