Re: [PATCH v8 17/25] x86/resctrl: Add the interface to assign/update counter assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Reinette,

On 10/21/2024 10:31 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
Hi Babu,

On 10/21/24 7:40 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
On 10/18/24 10:59, Reinette Chatre wrote:
On 10/17/24 3:56 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
On 10/15/2024 10:25 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
On 10/9/24 10:39 AM, Babu Moger wrote:

+ */
+int rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
+                   struct rdt_mon_domain *d, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
+{
+    int index = MBM_EVENT_ARRAY_INDEX(evtid);
+    int cntr_id = rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[index];
+    int ret;
+
+    /*
+     * Allocate a new counter id to the event if the counter is not
+     * assigned already.
+     */
+    if (cntr_id == MON_CNTR_UNSET) {
+        cntr_id = mbm_cntr_alloc(r);
+        if (cntr_id < 0) {
+            rdt_last_cmd_puts("Out of MBM assignable counters\n");
+            return -ENOSPC;
+        }
+        rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[index] = cntr_id;
+    }
+
+    if (!d) {
+        list_for_each_entry(d, &r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
+            ret = resctrl_arch_config_cntr(r, d, evtid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid,
+                               rdtgrp->closid, cntr_id, true);
+            if (ret)
+                goto out_done_assign;
+
+            set_bit(cntr_id, d->mbm_cntr_map);

The code pattern above is repeated four times in this work, twice in
rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event() and twice in rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event(). This
duplication should be avoided. It can be done in a function that also resets
the architectural state.

Are you suggesting to combine rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event() and rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event()?

No. My comment was about the following pattern that is repeated four times:
	...
	ret = resctrl_arch_config_cntr(...)
	if (ret)
		...
	set_bit()/clear_bit()
	...


ok.


It can be done. We need a flag to tell if it is a assign or unassign.

There is already a flag that is used by resctrl_arch_config_cntr(), the same parameters
as resctrl_arch_config_cntr() can be used for a wrapper that just calls
resctrl_arch_config_cntr() directly and uses that same flag to
select between set_bit() and clear_bit(). This wrapper can then also include
the reset of architectural state.

ok. Got it, It will look like this.


+/*
+ * Wrapper to configure the counter in a domain.
+ */

Please replace comment with a description of what the function does.

sure.


+static int rdtgroup_config_cntr(struct rdt_resource *r,struct

While it keeps being a challenge to get naming right I do think this
can start by replacing "rdtgroup" with "resctrl" (specifically,
"rdtgroup_config_cntr() -> resctrl_config_cntr()") because, as seen
with the parameters passed, this has nothing to do with rdtgroup.

Sure.


rdt_mon_domain *d,
+                               enum resctrl_event_id evtid, u32 rmid, u32
closid,
+                               u32 cntr_id, bool assign)
+{
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = resctrl_arch_config_cntr(r, d, evtid, rmid, closid, cntr_id,
assign);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       if (assign)
+               __set_bit(cntr_id, d->mbm_cntr_map);
+       else
+               __clear_bit(cntr_id, d->mbm_cntr_map);
+
+       /*
+        * Reset the architectural state so that reading of hardware
+        * counter is not considered as an overflow in next update.
+        */
+       resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(r, d, closid, rmid, evtid);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+

Yes, this looks good. Thank you.


Thanks-
- Babu Moger




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux