Eder Zulian <ezulian@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Correct references to swiotlb_tbl_map_single() and
> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() in the documentation for swiotlb.
>
> Fix two small typos that went unnoticed in commit c93f261dfc39
> ("Documentation/core-api: add swiotlb documentation"):
> swiotlb_tlb_map_single --> swiotlb_tbl_map_single
> swiotbl_tlb_unmap_single --> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
>
> Signed-off-by: Eder Zulian <ezulian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst b/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
> index cf06bae44ff8..9e0fe027dd3b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
> @@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ slot set.
>
> Fourth, the io_tlb_slot array keeps track of any "padding slots" allocated to
> meet alloc_align_mask requirements described above. When
> -swiotlb_tlb_map_single() allocates bounce buffer space to meet alloc_align_mask
> +swiotlb_tbl_map_single() allocates bounce buffer space to meet alloc_align_mask
> requirements, it may allocate pre-padding space across zero or more slots. But
> -when swiotbl_tlb_unmap_single() is called with the bounce buffer address, the
> +when swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() is called with the bounce buffer address, the
Wow ... that seems like the kind of function naming that is just
designed to cause errors of this type. Applied, thanks.
jon
