On 10/15/24 22:13, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Hi Babu, > > On 10/9/24 10:39 AM, Babu Moger wrote: >> dom_data_init() is only called during the __init sequence. >> Add __init attribute like the rest of call sequence. >> >> While at it, pass 'struct rdt_resource' to dom_data_init() and >> dom_data_exit() which will be used for mbm counter __init and__exit >> call sequence. > > This patch needs to be split. Please move fixes to beginning of series and > move the addition of the parameter to the patch where it is first used/needed. Sure. Will move the fixes to the beginning. > >> >> Fixes: bd334c86b5d7 ("x86/resctrl: Add __init attribute to rdt_get_mon_l3_config()") > > For this change I think the following Fixes tag would be more accurate: > Fixes: 6a445edce657 ("x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add RDT monitoring initialization") > > I think for a complete fix of the above commit it also needs to add __init > storage class to l3_mon_evt_init(). Yes. Sure. > > The __init storage class is also missing from rdt_get_mon_l3_config() ... 1 internal.h _int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r); 2 monitor.c int __init rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r) rdt_get_mon_l3_config() has __init attribute already. But prototype in internal.h does not add the '__init'. Looks like that is ok. > fixing that would indeed need the Fixes tag below: > Fixes: bd334c86b5d7 ("x86/resctrl: Add __init attribute to rdt_get_mon_l3_config()" How about addressing both dom_data_init() and l3_mon_evt_init() in a single patch and adding 2 fixes flags? Fixes: 6a445edce657 ("x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add RDT monitoring initialization") Fixes: bd334c86b5d7 ("x86/resctrl: Add __init attribute to rdt_get_mon_l3_config()") -- Thanks Babu Moger