Hi Tony, On 10/11/24 2:36 PM, Tony Luck wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:49:48PM -0500, Moger, Babu wrote: > > I.e. the user who chose this simply gave up being able to > read total bandwidth on domain 1, but didn't get an extra > counter in exchange for this sacrifice. That doesn't seem > like a good deal. As Babu mentioned earlier, this seems equivalent to the existing CLOSid management. For example, if a user assigns only CPUs from one domain to a resource group, it does not free up the CLOSID to create a new resource group dedicated to other domain(s). Reinette
