On 10/9/24 3:02 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 10/9/24 9:49 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Thanks for the hints. I hope if we can agree that documenting the macros was >>> intended to be supported, doesn't break the build (there are users already) >>> and has only those minor rendering issues, it can be used? >> >> I'd totally forgotten that this was supposed to work. >> >> Yes it can be used... $WE just need to find a way to make it work >> properly. > > The code probably isn't expecting a macro on the right side. I'll take a look, > but no promises. > That would have been too simple. I haven't found the problem yet. Ran out of time. Will continue on it tommorrow/Thursday. >> >> Every now and then I ponder rewriting kernel-doc in Rust, both to make >> it more reasonable to modify and as a learning exercise. But then I >> come to my senses and go back to stuff that actually needs to get done. > > That's a good way to lose helpers, although it might also gain you a few... > > Yesh, I know, current is Perl. > -- ~Randy