On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Good morning, > > This is a case of old english vs. new english. Using "implementors" is still > correct. Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the > kernel tree. Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move > forward with this patch. I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor". Should I create a patchset for it ? > Thanks, > Mathieu > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:15:57AM -0600, Everest K.C. wrote: > > Following spelling error reported by codespell > > was fixed: > > implementors ==> implementers > > > > Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > > index 348ee7e508ac..5c226fa076d6 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Typical usage > > rproc_shutdown(my_rproc); > > } > > > > -API for implementors > > +API for implementers > > ==================== > > > > :: > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > Thanks, Everest K.C.
