>> >> Are you suggesting a name change away from "clear_cpu_buffers" since it is >> clearly about the mitigation rather than the bug? I'm not sure there is a good >> common name for those 4 bugs that isn't about the mitigation, but I'm open >> to any suggestions. >> > > Yes, I think that would be better. I wasn't sure on a name either. In the RFDS webpage I see it described as "similar to data sampling transient execution attacks". Perhaps something like that could be an umbrella term? > Sure, I can change it. Thanks for the review! > --David Kaplan
